GROTON -- The sealed white envelope
arrived one day in May. Inside was a two-page letter
to Frank and Barbara Voss, from the state Department of Mental Retardation.
It said that the Voss' severely disabled son,
Eric, was included in a decade-old class action lawsuit, Rolland v
Patrick. Eric and about 30 others would be evicted
from Seven Hills, a pediatric nursing facility that he's known as
home for seven years. "It was a colossal
shock," said Frank Voss. "Our hearts sank. Because we truly
feel, that if Eric is moved from his home, it will kill him."
Eric, 27, is a quadriplegic with cerebral palsy.
He is fed through a tube and cannot talk. He has little ability to
communicate, except he sometimes smiles at voices he seems to recognize.
"Our son is medically fragile," Voss said.
"The people who added Eric's name to their list never met our
son. How could they possibly think they know what is best for him?"
A hole in the federal law allows lawyers
to bring civil-rights class actions forward without the people involved
knowing, and without allowing them to opt out. The court settlement
requires DMR to move 640 people statewide out of nursing facilities
and into group homes by 2012. Judge Kenneth Neiman, who ruled on
the case, said the lawsuit was a quality-of-life issue.
Living in group homes instead of nursing homes would
allow individuals like Eric to be part of the community, Neiman
said.
Voss looks around his son's room. A care provider
named Amy decorated it with a race car theme, because she knows
it makes Eric smile. She also knows that 1950s music makes Eric
laugh. "The people here are family," Voss said. "This
is a community. And we're prepared to fight to keep our son in his
home." 
It began with good intentions. In 1998, attorneys
were fighting to get a disabled Agawam woman named Loretta Rolland
out of a nursing home.
When Rolland's mother died, the state put Rolland,
then 51, into a nursing home for elderly residents. She lived there
six years. Rolland had cerebral palsy but could speak, eat and had
some mobility. In 2002, with help from her lawyers, Rolland moved
into her own apartment.
Voss said someone like Rolland would benefit from
community placement. But Eric's medical condition is far more fragile.
"It's a skill for Eric just to eat food,"
Voss said. "You cannot take people with disabilities and use
a one-size-fits-all approach. Especially the people at Seven Hills,
they have very specific medical needs."
The case was filed on behalf of 1,600 people. Initially,
the case placed more than 1,000 mentally retarded or developmentally
disabled people in community-based housing and care from 2000 to
2007. Nearly 800 remain in nursing homes.
Gov. Deval Patrick's administration agreed to a
new settlement in May. The state will move at least 80 percent,
or 600, of those remaining in the Rolland Plaintiff Class -- including
31 residents at Seven Hills.
"It's irresponsible," said Louis Putterman,
whose daughter, Laura, has lived at Seven Hills for 28 years. "How
can you make a list without getting parents involved? It seems to
defy belief in basic human rights."
Steve Schwartz, the plaintiffs' attorney, said the
list is misunderstood in many ways.
"The list is not absolute," Schwartz said.
Before anyone is placed into the community, state
officials and doctors must first perform a thorough medical evaluation
of all individuals on the list, and then work with families and
guardians to consider options.
The state's Executive Office for Human Services
said the case focused on hundreds of people who had no choice but
to live in nursing homes, where many were forgotten.
"The case required the state to develop community
living options, and many people have already successfully moved
into the community," spokeswoman Jennifer Kritz said.
Putterman said parents, not the state, know what
their child needs.
Most Seven Hills residents enter as children.
Think of a 1-year-old. None of them can walk or
talk. None can dress or feed themselves. Almost all are tube-fed,
receive multiple medications for seizure and other disorders, and
moved from place to place in wheelchairs by nursing assistants.
"They can't tell you or show you what they're
thinking and feeling," said Holly Jarek, vice president of
Seven Hills. "It takes years to put together a menu of experiences
that bring pleasure -- a stroke on the arm, a kiss on the cheek,
a song, a change in the pitch of your voice. It's what you collect
over time that makes the biggest difference."
Setsuko Gill, a certified nurse's assistant, has
cared for Laura Putterman since Laura was 9. Most mornings, Gill
wakes Laura and puts on the music that gets her going. Gill picks
out Laura's clothes, bathes her, dresses her and braids her hair.
The sound of Gill's voice, Putterman said, makes
his daughter smile.
"I know that the people who care for Laura
think of her as family," Putterman said. "That brings
a parent an extraordinary level of comfort that you just can't begin
to put into words."
The families of 43 Seven Hills patients are appealing
the settlement in U.S. Appeals Court. Parents have enlisted the
help of state and federal lawmakers.
State Sen. Steven Panagiotakos, D-Lowell, visited
Seven Hills.
"I saw some of the most complicated medical
cases that I've ever seen, and I also saw some of the most dedicated
health-care providers I've ever seen," Panagiotakos said. "The
bottom line is that if someone's future is going to be at stake
in something like this, they should be notified as early as possible
to have a say. They shouldn't have it brought to them after the
fact."
Panagiotakos is pressing the state to put an agreement
in writing that says the families will be consulted and involved
in any further matters that include their children.
U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat,
has filed legislation that requires parents and guardians to be
notified about class-action suits, and to allow them to opt out.
Panagiotakos said none of the residents from Seven
Hills appears to be in the next wave of 160 scheduled for community
placement.
But many parents believe a move is inevitable. It
costs $150,000 to $200,000 per year to keep some residents at Seven
Hills, and a group home is cheaper.
But at what cost, Voss wondered.
"Our children can't speak for themselves, so
we will fight for them," Voss said. "If individuals like
Eric are moved, they won't live long. They shouldn't have to give
their lives for a lawsuit that has nothing to do with them."
The families of Seven Hills are inviting the public
to join them in a march to send a message next Sunday at 1:30 p.m.,
at Seven Hills, 22 Hillside Ave., Groton. For information, visit
their Web site at www.AvertRollandTragedy.org. To read the settlement,
go to http://www.rollandatreview.org/ExhibitA_settlement_agreement.pdf.
To
view Lowell Sun Online Article Version, Please Click Here.
|