People
Worth Protecting
Background
& Overview
|
| |
| In
this, and the next few pages, we want to provide general information
on the Seven Hills Pediatric Center and a brief history of
the legal struggles we are facing to protect our family members.
This is not a fight we can win alone, any and all support
you can lend to help our cause is greatly appreciated. |
| |
The
Opposition By The Seven Hills Families |
In
May, 2008, guardians of 43 Seven Hills Pediatric Center patient’s
filed an objection to the Settlement Agreement, but this was
overruled by the presiding Federal Magistrate Judge, Kenneth
Neiman. The same families asked to have the plaintiff class
decertified so that their children or siblings would not be
included in the process. This motion was rejected by Judge Neiman.
Presently the families’ attorney, Stephen Sheehy, and
attorney Anthony Fiotto of the law firm Goodwin Procter, are
appealing the Settlement Agreement in the U.S. Appeals Court
for the First Circuit. The family members’
gravest objection is that the Massachusetts Department of
Mental Retardation is not competent to judge whether their
loved ones will benefit from being forcibly moved from the
Pediatric Center over the objections of family members. The
family members believe that their loved ones will die if deprived
of the level of intensive, on-going medical and nursing attention
that can be provided only at the scale of the Pediatric Center.
Their doctors agree with this opinion. No doctor was consulted
when the DMR gave a list of 31 Seven Hills Pediatric Center
patients to Judge Neiman, classifying them as capable of benefiting
from community placement (that is, suitable for moving from
Seven Hills Pediatric Center with or without agreement by
their guardians). The parents are fighting against this process,
especially the court’s and the state’s assignment
of complete decision-making control to the medically unqualified
DMR, in order to save the lives of their children. We ask
the public to join us in this life-and-death struggle for
justice and preservation of life.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|